Andrew Morgan-Watts, Drew Morgan-Watts, John Howliston, Munira Hassam and Andrew Dakers

LETTER: Nuclear debate heats up as local MPs appear to say "Yes"

2.26.31pm GMT Sun 22nd Jan 2006

Dungeness Nuclear Power Station (photography: Tim Prater)

The Tyndall Centre and the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution say that we can achieve a 60 per cent reduction in carbon by 2050 without a new generation of nuclear power

On 17 January, in an Opposition Day debate led by the Liberal Democrats, our local Labour MPs Ann Keen and Alan Keen voted that they "do not oppose the construction of a new generation of civil nuclear power plants."

The arguments in favour of nuclear power have been based on two things: security of supply and global warming.

We can all agree about the absolute imperative of tackling climate change, but we can achieve that without nuclear power. It is not just Liberal Democrats saying that. The Tyndall Centre and the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution say that we can achieve a 60 per cent reduction in carbon by 2050. The Carbon Trust believes that we can achieve it, and the Government's own White Paper, which was published just three years ago, also claimed that. So there is no case for arguing that there is no alternative to nuclear power.

Since the last review, the Government have abjectly failed to do anything effective to cut energy waste. Departments are some of the worst offenders and the Treasury is the worst of all. The Government have also failed to develop a broad mix of renewable sources of energy. They will fail miserably to achieve their target of reducing 20 per cent of CO2 emissions by 2010.

There is a central contradiction in the Prime Minister's approach. The Government argues for "promoting competitive markets" but nuclear becomes viable only with a massive distortion of the market.

There is also a risk of the Government losing interest in renewable investment. They have not shown much in any case, but we may already be witnessing a reduction in commitment and investment. Clear Skies and photovoltaic programmes have run their course. Now the successor programmes provide reduced investment per year compared with previous schemes.

So come on Ann and Alan explain why you want this nuclear quick fix, rather than sorting out the government's own back yard and investing substantially in renewable energy.

Andrew Dakers, Lib Dem Spokesperson for Brentford & Isleworth

Satnam Kaur Khalsa, Lib Dem Spokesperson for Feltham & Heston

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story
Previous news story: Independent report shows Hounslow General Election shambles (Mon 16th Jan 2006).
Next news story: LETTER: Access to Alzheimer's drugs (Thu 26th Jan 2006).

Related News Stories:

Mon 16th Apr 2007:

Sun 8th Jan 2006:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by R N Banerji on behalf of Hounslow Liberal Democrats at 127 Central Avenue, Hounslow, Middlesex TW3 2RQ.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.